Have you been charged with Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What does it mean to be charged with contaminating goods with intent to cause, or being reckless as to whether it would course, public alarm or economic loss?
If you’ve been charged under Section 249 of the Crimes Act 1958, the consequences can be severe, with the possibility of a lengthy prison sentence or substantial fines. You must consult a specialist criminal lawyer as soon as possible to discuss your defence options.
The charge of Contaminating Goods involves deliberately or recklessly tampering with goods to cause harm. This could include causing public alarm, anxiety, or economic loss. The law takes such actions seriously due to their potential to create widespread panic or financial damage.
What Must the Prosecution Prove:
To convict you of this offence, the prosecution must prove:
- You contaminated goods.
- The contamination was intended to:
- Cause public alarm, anxiety, or economic loss.
- Alternatively, you were reckless in failing to recognise that the contamination could cause these effects.
The focus will be on intent and recklessness, meaning the prosecution will need to demonstrate that you either planned to cause harm or should have been aware that your actions could lead to serious consequences.
Penalties for contaminating goods with intent to cause, or being reckless as to whether it would cause, public alarm or economic loss?
The penalties for this offence are severe:
- Level 5 imprisonment, which carries a maximum sentence of 10 years.
- A Level 5 fine of up to 1200 penalty units.
- In some cases, both a fine and imprisonment may apply.
Where will my case be heard?
Cases of contaminating goods with intent or recklessness can be heard in either the Magistrates’ Court or the County Court, depending on the seriousness of the offence and the circumstances surrounding it.
Factors and defences to consider:
- Did you knowingly contaminate goods?
- Was there an intention to cause harm or were you reckless in not considering the impact of your actions?
- Could there be a reasonable explanation for the contamination that doesn’t involve intent or recklessness?
- Do you have any defences that could be raised to challenge the charge?
- If you are considering pleading guilty, what steps can you take to minimise your sentence?
Testimonials
What people Say
-
Thanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖Fi... Read More5/5
-
I recently used the services of Marie Lukic of MK law. She is very professional, dedicated and knowledgeable lawyer. Extremely grateful to have Ma... Read More5/5
-
Marie Lukic defended me and l couldn’t be happier with the results, she listened too what l said and was able too put in her words too get me th... Read More5/5
-
I found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and h... Read More5/5
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Officer of a Company That Has Induced Frauds
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What happens next?
If you are facing this charge, it is vital to seek legal advice from an experienced criminal lawyer. Early and thorough preparation is essential for achieving the best possible outcome, whether through defending the charge or negotiating a reduced sentence.
Book an appointment with MK Law on 1800 130 120 to discuss your options and receive expert guidance on how to proceed.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au