Have you been charged with Failing to Keep Proper Records?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What does it mean to fail to keep proper records?
Failing to Keep Proper Records is an offence under Section 50 of the Taxation Administration Act 1997. This offence targets individuals or entities that fail to maintain adequate records needed to assess tax liabilities accurately.
Proper record-keeping is essential for ensuring compliance with taxation laws, and failure to do so can lead to significant penalties. This offence is commonly pursued when tax records are incomplete or missing, hindering the proper assessment of tax obligations.
What Must the Prosecution Prove:
To secure a conviction for Failing to Keep Proper Records, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
1.You failed to keep all necessary records:
The records in question must be those required to enable the proper assessment of the defendant’s tax liability under a taxation law.
2. The prosecution may also need to demonstrate that the failure to keep records was intentional or due to negligence by you.
Penalties for failing to keep proper records:
The penalties for this offence are significant and vary depending on whether the offender is a body corporate or an individual:
- Body Corporate: A fine of up to 500 penalty units.
- Individual: A fine of up to 100 penalty units.
The penalty unit system is regularly updated, meaning fines can be substantial, particularly for corporate entities.
Where will my case be heard?
Cases involving failing to keep proper records are heard in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria, which deals with summary offences and matters under state taxation law.
Factors and defences to consider:
There are several factors that may influence the outcome of a case:
- Intent:
Whether the failure to keep proper records was intentional or an oversight. Accidental or unintentional failures may lead to more lenient treatment, especially if mitigating factors can be shown.
- Compliance History:
Your past history with record-keeping and tax compliance may be relevant. A first-time offender may receive a lighter penalty than a repeat offender.
- Possible Defences:
A potential defence could be that you were unaware of the specific record-keeping requirements or that they reasonably believed the records kept were sufficient. Alternatively, you might argue that the failure was due to circumstances beyond your control, such as a loss of records through no fault of their own (e.g., fire, theft, or natural disaster).
By talking to an expert criminal defence lawyer, a tailored defence strategy can be applied to your personal situation. It is important to engage in expert advice as soon as possible for your best outcome.
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
I found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and h... Read MoreI found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and history, but once I spoke to Jasmin Dhillon and the MK Law team, all my worries were taken away! Jasmin took the time to explain to me the process and kept me informed every step of the way, she has a deep understanding of the law and a genuine heartfelt commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for her clients. Thanks to her hard work and expertise, we achieved a no conviction outcome which has enabled me to continue working hard and pursue my dream career! I am forever grateful for their service and would highly recommend the MK Law team to anyone in need of legal assistance, they are truly dedicated and one of a kind in their field. Read Less55/5
-
Thanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖Fi... Read MoreThanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖First time getting charged, didn't know what to do. I was like a fish out of water. Started to research some law firms and mk law popped did some background checks and found good info about the firm. So I stuck with them and i don't regret nothing about my experience with mk law..... Read Less55/5
-
I recently used the services of Marie Lukic of MK law. She is very professional, dedicated and knowledgeable lawyer. Extremely grateful to have Ma... Read MoreI recently used the services of Marie Lukic of MK law. She is very professional, dedicated and knowledgeable lawyer. Extremely grateful to have Marie who did exceptional job. I would highly recommend Marie Lukic of MK law firm. 👍 Read Less55/5
-
Marie Lukic defended me and l couldn’t be happier with the results, she listened too what l said and was able too put in her words too get me th... Read MoreMarie Lukic defended me and l couldn’t be happier with the results, she listened too what l said and was able too put in her words too get me the best results. She’s a fighter and goes into battle for her client 5 stars l highly recommend her thanks Marie Read Less55/5
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Officer of a Company That Has Induced Frauds
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What happens next?
If you have been charged with Failing to Keep Proper Records, it is crucial to seek legal advice immediately. Early preparation is key to mounting a successful defence or mitigating the severity of the penalties. A skilled criminal lawyer can help assess the prosecution’s case, advise you on possible defences, and guide you through the legal process.
Contact MK Law today on 1800 130 120 to discuss your case with one of our experienced criminal defence lawyers. We specialise in taxation offences and will ensure that your case is handled with the expertise it deserves. Act now to protect your rights and achieve the best possible outcome for your case.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au