Possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Unauthorised Access, Modification Or Impairment With Intent To Commit A Serious Offence
-
Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment
-
Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication
-
Possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence
-
Producing, Supplying or Obtaining Data with Intent to Commit Serious Computer Offence
-
Unauthorised Access to or Modification of Restricted Data
-
Unauthorised Impairment of Data Held in Computer Disk, Credit Card or Other Device
What does it mean to be charged with possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence?
Possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence is defined under Section 247E of the Crimes Act 1958 (“CA”). This indictable offence pertains to an individual who possesses or controls data with the intention of committing or facilitating a serious computer offence while being reckless regarding the impairment of electronic communication.
The nature of this offence reflects the growing concern over computer-related crimes, which often include unauthorised access to confidential data, modification of data, or impairment of electronic communications. Common examples of this offence may include situations where an individual possesses software designed to infiltrate secure systems or disrupt electronic communications, often with malicious intent.
What the Prosecution Must Prove:
To establish a charge of possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence, the prosecution must prove several key elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1.Possession/Control:
You must have possessed or controlled a computer, data, or a device that contains data.
2. Intent:
You intended to use the data to commit or facilitate a serious computer offence, which could involve unauthorised access, data modification, or impairment of electronic communication.
3. Recklessness:
You acted recklessly concerning the impairment of electronic communication. This means they were aware of the potential consequences of their actions but proceeded regardless.
4. Serious Computer Offence:
The data must be intended for use in a serious computer offence as defined under the relevant sections of the Crimes Act.
If the prosecution fails to establish any of these elements, the accused may not be found guilty.
What penalties apply for possessing data with intent to commit a serious crime:
The penalties for possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence can be severe, reflecting the gravity of the crime. If found guilty, the accused may face:
- Imprisonment: A maximum term of imprisonment of up to three years.
- Diversion Programs: Options may be available for first-time offenders or those with mental health issues, which could lead to a non-conviction outcome.
- Community Corrections Order: This may be imposed instead of imprisonment, with conditions attached.
- Fines: Financial penalties may also be imposed, either as a conviction or non-conviction outcome.
- Good Behaviour Bonds: The court may issue a promise to be of good behaviour, where the accused must comply with certain conditions for a specified period.
Where the Case Will Be Heard:
Cases of possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence are typically dealt with in the Magistrates Court of Victoria, given that it is classified as a serious (indictable) offence. Depending on the circumstances, more serious cases may be escalated to higher courts.
Factors and Defences to Consider:
When preparing a defence for this charge, several factors and potential defences must be considered:
- Lack of Evidence: The prosecution must prove all elements of the offence; if they cannot, the accused should be found not guilty.
- Intention and Possession: The defence may argue that the accused did not intend to use the data to commit an offence or that they did not possess the data in question.
- Duress: If the accused was forced to possess the data under threat, this could serve as a complete defence.
- Alibi: Evidence proving the accused’s presence elsewhere during the alleged offence could exonerate them.
- Mistaken Identity: If the accused was wrongly identified as being involved in the crime, this could also serve as a defence.
- Mental Impairment: Under the Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act 1997, if the accused was suffering from a mental impairment at the time of the offence and did not understand the nature of their actions, they cannot be found guilty.
Testimonials
What people Say
-
Michael Sunderland from MK Law handled my matter with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. It was clear that he genuinely cared about gett... Read More5/5
-
I cannot thank Michael Sunderland from MK Law enough for the way he handled my case. From the very beginning, Michael was highly professional, kno... Read More5/5
-
I would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first m... Read More5/5
-
I would like to highly recommend Michael Sunderland. Michael took on my matter from another lawyer that was not able to represent me at the time. ... Read More5/5
Why Choose MK Law:
If you find yourself charged with possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence, it is crucial to seek representation from a law firm with expertise in computer-related criminal law. MK Law has a dedicated team of criminal defence lawyers who specialise in navigating the complexities of such cases. Our approach includes:
We take the time to listen to our clients’ unique situations, providing tailored legal advice and options. Our lawyers have a proven track record of representing clients in similar charges, employing effective strategies to mitigate penalties. We conduct our investigations, analyse evidence, and prepare compelling defences to challenge the prosecution’s case.
From your initial consultation to court representation, you will work with the same team of lawyers who understand your case inside and out. With MK Law, you will receive expert guidance throughout the legal process, helping you navigate this intimidating environment with confidence. Contact our experienced team for confidential legal advice 24/7 at 1800 130 120.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au