Have you been charged with Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Unauthorised Access, Modification Or Impairment With Intent To Commit A Serious Offence
-
Unauthorised Modification of Data to Cause Impairment
-
Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication
-
Possessing data with intent to commit a serious computer offence
-
Producing, Supplying or Obtaining Data with Intent to Commit Serious Computer Offence
-
Unauthorised Access to or Modification of Restricted Data
-
Unauthorised Impairment of Data Held in Computer Disk, Credit Card or Other Device
What does it mean to be charged with unauthorised impairment of electronic communication?
Section 247D of the Crimes Act (“CA”) criminalises the unauthorised impairment of electronic communication to or from a computer. This offence addresses situations where an individual unlawfully interferes with the normal flow of electronic communications, such as blocking, disrupting, or altering data transmissions. The law targets both intentional and reckless actions that impair electronic communication without proper authorisation, potentially causing significant harm to individuals, businesses, or public services.
What Must the Prosecution Prove?
To convict someone of unauthorised impairment of electronic communication under Section 247D, the prosecution must establish the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
- You caused the electronic communication to or from a computer to be impaired in some way, such as disrupting, blocking, or altering the communication.
- Your actions in impairing the communication were unauthorised, meaning they did not have permission or legal authority to do so.
- You knew that your actions were unauthorised.
- Intent or Recklessness:
- You either intended to impair the electronic communication or
- Were reckless as to whether your actions would cause such impairment. Recklessness means that you were aware of the risk of impairment but disregarded it and proceeded with the actions.
Penalties for unauthorised impairment of electronic communication:
The offence of unauthorised impairment of electronic communication under Section 247D carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment (level 5 imprisonment).
The severity of the punishment reflects the potentially significant damage that such actions can cause to communication networks and the data they carry.
Where will my case be heard?
Unauthorised Impairment of Electronic Communication will be heard in the Magistrates’ Court. If it is a very serious example of the offence, it could be the County Court.
Factors and defences to consider:
- Did you impair electronic communication?
- Did you intend to impair the communication or were you reckless as to whether impairment would occur?
- How long and to what extent the electronic communication was disrupted?
- Were you actions accidental?
- Do you have any previous convictions of a similar nature?
- Did you have authorisation to impair such communication?
- What were the surrounding circumstances of this offence?
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
Michael Sunderland from MK Law handled my matter with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. It was clear that he genuinely cared about gett... Read MoreMichael Sunderland from MK Law handled my matter with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. It was clear that he genuinely cared about getting the best result possible, and his preparation and courtroom presence reflected that commitment. Michael’s professional demeanour and respectful conduct, both with me and within the court, gave me the utmost confidence I was in the right hands. He clearly explained the process, kept me informed, and made me feel confident throughout. The outcome was far better than I expected, thanks to his expertise and strategic approach. I’m truly grateful for his support and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him. Read Less55/5
-
I cannot thank Michael Sunderland from MK Law enough for the way he handled my case. From the very beginning, Michael was highly professional, kno... Read MoreI cannot thank Michael Sunderland from MK Law enough for the way he handled my case. From the very beginning, Michael was highly professional, knowledgeable, and thorough in every aspect of the process. He took the time to explain everything clearly, which gave me great comfort and confidence throughout what could have been a very stressful time. Michael’s expertise and guidance reassured me that I was in the best hands, and his calm and confident approach made a huge difference to my peace of mind. He was always approachable, responsive, and dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome for me. I would highly recommend Michael Sunderland to anyone seeking a lawyer who is not only exceptionally skilled but also genuinely cares about his clients. Read Less55/5
-
I would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first m... Read MoreI would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first meeting, she was calm, respectful, and clear about what I could expect. She never judged me, always listened carefully, and explained every step of the legal process in a way that made me feel supported and confident. Ashleigh handled my case involving a traffic offence with care and honesty. She gave me solid advice, helped me prepare all the right documents, and even guided me on how to speak respectfully in court. Because of her help, I was able to present myself properly before the judge and achieve a much better outcome than I expected. What really stood out to me was her genuine concern for my future. She didn’t treat me like “just another case.” Ashleigh is not only a skilled lawyer — she is also a kind person who truly cares about her clients. I highly recommend Ashleigh to anyone in need of legal help. She is trustworthy, professional, and goes above and beyond for her clients. Thank you again for everything. Read Less55/5
-
I would like to highly recommend Michael Sunderland. Michael took on my matter from another lawyer that was not able to represent me at the time. ... Read MoreI would like to highly recommend Michael Sunderland. Michael took on my matter from another lawyer that was not able to represent me at the time. Michael was well prepared, taking onboard all the information, with communication all the way. He clearly explains all the outcomes and was by my side every step of the way. A genuine caring lawyer that has your best interest. Read Less55/5
What happens next?
If you have been charged with unauthorised impairment of electronic communication under Section 247D, it is essential to act quickly and seek legal advice. This offence carries severe consequences, including the potential for imprisonment of up to 10 years. At MK Law, we have extensive experience in dealing with complex cyber-related charges. Our dedicated legal team will work with you to understand the charges, examine the evidence, and build a strong defence strategy. Contact MK Law today on 1800 130 120 for expert legal assistance and ensure your rights are protected throughout the legal process.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au