Have you been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What does it mean to be charged with failing to provide access to records?
If you have been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records under Section 53 of the Taxation Administration Act 1997, it is essential to understand the implications of this charge.
This offence revolves around the obligation to keep certain records under taxation law and to ensure they are available for inspection by the Commissioner of Taxation.
What Must the Prosecution Prove:
To secure a conviction for this offence, the prosecution must demonstrate the following elements:
1.You were required by taxation law to keep a record:
This involves confirming that the specific record in question falls under the statutory obligations of taxation law.
2. You failed to keep the record in a way that allowed it to be readily produced to the Commissioner:
This means the record was either not kept at all or not maintained in a manner that made it easily accessible when requested.
Penalties for failing to provide access to records:
The penalties associated with this offence are significant and vary depending on whether the defendant is a corporation or an individual:
- Body Corporate: Up to 200 penalty units.
- Individual: Up to 40 penalty units.
Where will my case be heard?
Charges for failing to provide access to Records are heard exclusively in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria.
Factors and defences to consider:
When facing this charge, consider the following potential defences and mitigating circumstances:
- Record Requirement:
Establishing that the record in question was not actually required to be kept under taxation law may provide a viable defence.
- Access Issues:
If there were genuine reasons (e.g., unforeseen circumstances) for the failure to provide access to the records, these may be presented as mitigating factors.
- Readiness of Records:
If you can prove that the records were kept but were temporarily unavailable for reasons beyond your control, this may help reduce liability.
Questions to Ask:
Before deciding how to plead, discuss these key questions with your lawyer:
- Was the record required under taxation law?
- What specific steps were taken to maintain accessibility to the records?
- Are there any extenuating circumstances that may reduce your culpability?
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
I would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first m... Read MoreI would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first meeting, she was calm, respectful, and clear about what I could expect. She never judged me, always listened carefully, and explained every step of the legal process in a way that made me feel supported and confident. Ashleigh handled my case involving a traffic offence with care and honesty. She gave me solid advice, helped me prepare all the right documents, and even guided me on how to speak respectfully in court. Because of her help, I was able to present myself properly before the judge and achieve a much better outcome than I expected. What really stood out to me was her genuine concern for my future. She didn’t treat me like “just another case.” Ashleigh is not only a skilled lawyer — she is also a kind person who truly cares about her clients. I highly recommend Ashleigh to anyone in need of legal help. She is trustworthy, professional, and goes above and beyond for her clients. Thank you again for everything. Read Less55/5
-
Thanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖Fi... Read MoreThanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖First time getting charged, didn't know what to do. I was like a fish out of water. Started to research some law firms and mk law popped did some background checks and found good info about the firm. So I stuck with them and i don't regret nothing about my experience with mk law..... Read Less55/5
-
I found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and h... Read MoreI found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and history, but once I spoke to Jasmin Dhillon and the MK Law team, all my worries were taken away! Jasmin took the time to explain to me the process and kept me informed every step of the way, she has a deep understanding of the law and a genuine heartfelt commitment to achieving the best possible outcome for her clients. Thanks to her hard work and expertise, we achieved a no conviction outcome which has enabled me to continue working hard and pursue my dream career! I am forever grateful for their service and would highly recommend the MK Law team to anyone in need of legal assistance, they are truly dedicated and one of a kind in their field. Read Less55/5
-
Professional. Transparent. Experienced. Marcus Denning left no stone unturned, sealing a complete win at trial. Our experience at MK LAW was beyon... Read MoreProfessional. Transparent. Experienced. Marcus Denning left no stone unturned, sealing a complete win at trial. Our experience at MK LAW was beyond exceptional. Read Less55/5
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Officer of a Company That Has Induced Frauds
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What happens next?
If you have been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records, it is crucial to consult with an experienced criminal lawyer as soon as possible. Legal representation can help clarify whether the record was legally required, assess the strength of the prosecution’s case, and explore your defence options.
Contact MK Law on 1800 130 120 today to arrange an appointment with one of our knowledgeable lawyers. Timely legal advice and preparation are vital to achieving the best possible outcome in your case.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au