Have You Been Charged with Administering Certain Substances?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Aggravated Assault
-
Wilful Damage
-
Common Assault
-
Public Display of a Nazi Symbol or the Nazi Salute
-
Harassing a Witness
-
Recklessly Causing Serious Injury In Circumstances Of Gross Violence
-
Affray Charges In Victoria
-
Intentionally Causing Serious Injury in Circumstances of Gross Violence
-
Intentionally causing Serious Injury
-
Recklessly Causing Serious Injury
-
Intentionally Causing Injury
-
Administering Certain Substances
-
Threats to Kill and Assault Offences
-
Stalking
-
Negligently Causing Serious Injury
-
Extortion With Threat to Kill
-
Extortion, With Threats to Destroy and/or Endanger Property
-
Threatening to Prevent Arrest
-
Using a Firearm in the Commission of an Offence
-
Being Armed with Criminal Intent
-
Kidnapping
-
Robbery
-
Armed Robbery
-
Home Invasion
-
Aggravated Home Invasion
-
Arson
-
Criminal Damage
-
False Imprisonment
-
Public Nuisance
-
Riot
-
Rout Offence
-
Unlawful Assembly
-
Intentionally Causing a Very Serious Disease
What Does It Mean to Be Charged with Administering Certain Substances?
Being charged with administering certain substances under Section 19 of the Crimes Act 1958 is a serious offence. This offence occurs when a person administers or causes another person to take a substance that could interfere substantially with their bodily functions, knowing the effect of the substance and without the person’s consent or being reckless as to whether consent was given.
What does an offence like this look like?
- Administering or Causing a Person to Take a Substance: The person must have taken action that directly caused another person to take the substance.
- Interference with Bodily Functions: The substance administered must be capable of substantially affecting the person’s bodily functions.
- Consent: The person must not have consented, or the defendant must have been reckless as to whether consent was given.
- No Lawful Excuse: The defendant must have acted without lawful justification.
What the Prosecution Must Prove:
To convict you, the prosecution must establish the following:
- You administered or caused the person to take a substance.
- The substance had the potential to interfere substantially with the person’s bodily functions.
- You knew or were reckless about the substance’s effects.
- The person did not consent to the administration of the substance.
If the prosecution cannot establish all elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt, you are not guilty.
Given the severity of this offence, it is important to consult one of our lawyers at MK Law to tailor a defence strategy specific to your circumstances.
Penalties Relating to Administering Certain Substances:
Administering a substance without consent can result in severe penalties, including imprisonment. This offence carries a Level 6 penalty with a maximum term of imprisonment of up to 5 years.
Other penalties may include:
- Diversion programs (for first-time offenders or those with mental health issues),
- Community corrections orders, or
- Financial fines.
Where Will My Case Be Heard?
The charge of administering certain substances is typically dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. However, depending on the case’s seriousness, it may be escalated to a higher court.
Questions to Consider Before Pleading Guilty or Not Guilty:
When considering how to approach your case, it is essential to weigh the following points:
- Does the prosecution have a strong case against me?
- Should I plead guilty or contest the charge?
- Did I administer a substance?
- Did I know the substance could interfere with bodily functions?
- Did the person consent to the act?
- Do I have a lawful reason to justify administering the substance?
- What evidence can I rely on in my defence (e.g., alibi, witness statements)?
What are some defences to consider?
If you are pleading not guilty, the following defences may be available, depending on the context of the case:
- The prosecution cannot establish all elements of the offence.
- You did not administer or cause the person to take the substance.
- The substance did not interfere substantially with the person’s bodily functions.
- The victim consented (if this can be proven).
- Duress (you were forced to act under threat or in an emergency situation).
- Mistaken identity (you were not the person who administered the substance).
Factors and Defences to Consider:
- The nature of the substance: Was it capable of interfering with the person’s bodily functions? Did you know this at the time?
- The victim’s state: Was the person capable of consenting at the time the substance was administered?
- The circumstances surrounding the event: Did you act in a way that would justify the administration (e.g., in an emergency)?
- Witness testimony: Are there any discrepancies in witness accounts or evidence that could work in your favour?
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
I had a great experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. From our very first consultation, it was evident that Daniel approached his role with profe... Read MoreI had a great experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. From our very first consultation, it was evident that Daniel approached his role with professionalism, compassion, and confidence. He took the time to clearly explain each step of the process, ensuring that I felt informed and prepared every step of the way. His ability to convey complex legal situations in a straightforward manner made a significant difference in my understanding and comfort level. The outcome he achieved was a testament to his exceptional skill and unwavering commitment to my case. If you are in need of a lawyer who genuinely cares about their clients, communicates effectively, and fights tirelessly for the best possible result, I recommend Daniel Moon and the dedicated team at MK Law. Their support made a challenging experience much more manageable, and I am truly grateful for their expertise. Read Less55/5
-
I want to sincerely thank my lawyer, Daniel, for the exceptional support he provided throughout my matter. He was professional, understanding, and... Read MoreI want to sincerely thank my lawyer, Daniel, for the exceptional support he provided throughout my matter. He was professional, understanding, and always made sure I knew exactly what was happening at every step. Daniel kept me updated regularly, explained everything in a way I could understand, and never made me feel judged. Most importantly, he worked incredibly hard to achieve the best possible outcome for me. His dedication and attention to detail truly made a difference in my case. I am genuinely grateful for his guidance and support. I highly recommend Daniel to anyone needing a lawyer who is honest, reliable, and genuinely committed to helping their clients. Read Less55/5
-
I immediately knew that Daniel understood the details of my case and that his intelligence and diligence would give me the best chance of overcomi... Read MoreI immediately knew that Daniel understood the details of my case and that his intelligence and diligence would give me the best chance of overcoming the matter. His experience, professionalism and compassion made me feel defended from the get go. Luckily a good outcome too. Would highly recommend MK Law. Read Less55/5
-
We were incredibly pleased with the work Daniel Moon did both prior to and on the day of court. Nothing was ever too much, questions always answer... Read MoreWe were incredibly pleased with the work Daniel Moon did both prior to and on the day of court. Nothing was ever too much, questions always answered in a timely manner and very personable. Would highly recommend to anyone. The work and the way in which it was presented was both extremely professional and amiable. Read Less55/5
-
Aggravated Assault
-
Wilful Damage
-
Common Assault
-
Public Display of a Nazi Symbol or the Nazi Salute
-
Harassing a Witness
-
Recklessly Causing Serious Injury In Circumstances Of Gross Violence
-
Affray Charges In Victoria
-
Intentionally Causing Serious Injury in Circumstances of Gross Violence
-
Intentionally causing Serious Injury
-
Recklessly Causing Serious Injury
-
Intentionally Causing Injury
-
Administering Certain Substances
-
Threats to Kill and Assault Offences
-
Stalking
-
Negligently Causing Serious Injury
-
Extortion With Threat to Kill
-
Extortion, With Threats to Destroy and/or Endanger Property
-
Threatening to Prevent Arrest
-
Using a Firearm in the Commission of an Offence
-
Being Armed with Criminal Intent
-
Kidnapping
-
Robbery
-
Armed Robbery
-
Home Invasion
-
Aggravated Home Invasion
-
Arson
-
Criminal Damage
-
False Imprisonment
-
Public Nuisance
-
Riot
-
Rout Offence
-
Unlawful Assembly
-
Intentionally Causing a Very Serious Disease
What happens next?
If you have been charged with administering a certain substance, it is essential to seek legal representation immediately. Your lawyer at MK Law will review your case, assess the evidence, and guide you through the legal process. Whether you decide to plead guilty or contest the charges, your lawyer will prepare a defence strategy tailored to the specifics of your case.
To ensure the best possible outcome, be sure to provide your lawyer with all relevant details, evidence, and documentation. Contact MK Law for expert legal advice at 1800 130 120 or at marcus@mklawfirm.com.au.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au