MK Law
1800 130 120

Have you been charged with Destruction of Evidence?

  • Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
  • Track record of success​
  • Nationally acclaimed expertise​

Free Legal Advice 24/7

  • Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
  • Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
  • Failing to Keep Proper Records
  • Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
  • Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
  • Failing to Provide Access to Records
  • Form of Record
  • Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
  • Deliberately Omitting Information
  • Falsifying or Concealing Identity
  • Tax Evasion
  • Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
  • Destruction of Evidence
  • Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
  • False Accounting
  • Falsification of Documents
  • Suppression of Documents

What does it mean to be charged with destruction of evidence?

Section 254 of the Crimes Act 1958 (“CA”) criminalises the destruction, concealment, or alteration of any document or thing that is, or is reasonably likely to be, required as evidence in a legal proceeding. This offence is treated seriously because it undermines the integrity of the legal process by preventing evidence from being used in court.

What Must the Prosecution Prove:

For someone to be found guilty of the Destruction of Evidence under Section 254, the prosecution must prove the following elements:

1.You must have known, or should have reasonably known, that the document or object was:

    • Required, or
    • Reasonably likely to be required as evidence in a legal proceeding.
 

This means that even if a case has not yet started, but a person knows the item may be important for a future legal case, this section applies.

2.You either:

    • Destroyed, concealed, or altered the document or item, making it illegible, undecipherable, or impossible to identify, or
    • Authorised or permitted another person to do any of the above.
 

This includes directly committing the act or allowing someone else to do it with your knowledge or approval.

3. The act must have been done with the intention of preventing the document or thing from being used as evidence in a legal proceeding.

If the destruction or concealment happened without this intent, the offence may not be established.

Penalties for destruction of evidence:

a judge sitting at a desk
  • Maximum Penalty: The offence is punishable by Level 6 imprisonment, which is up to 5 years.
  • Alternatively, a Level 6 fine or both imprisonment and a fine may be imposed.
  • For a body corporate: If a company or other legal entity is found guilty, the maximum fine is 3000 penalty units (as per the Sentencing Act 1991, section 113D).
a judge sitting at a desk

Where will my case be heard?

This offence is classified as indictable, which means it is a serious crime and will typically be heard in the County Court of Victoria. However, some less serious cases may be dealt with in the Magistrates’ Court under certain conditions.

Factors and defences to consider:

  • Knowledge:

The prosecution must prove that you knew or should have known that the document or item was relevant to a legal case.

  • Intention:

The act of destruction or concealment must have been carried out with the specific intention of preventing the item from being used in court. Without this intent, the charge may fail.

  • Reasonableness:

If you can show that they did not reasonably know the item was going to be used in legal proceedings, they may have a defence.

Testimonials

What people Say

  • I had a great experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. From our very first consultation, it was evident that Daniel approached his role with profe... Read More
    5
    5/5
  • I want to sincerely thank my lawyer, Daniel, for the exceptional support he provided throughout my matter. He was professional, understanding, and... Read More
    5
    5/5
  • I immediately knew that Daniel understood the details of my case and that his intelligence and diligence would give me the best chance of overcomi... Read More
    5
    5/5
  • We were incredibly pleased with the work Daniel Moon did both prior to and on the day of court. Nothing was ever too much, questions always answer... Read More
    5
    5/5

White Collar Crime

  • Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
  • Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
  • Failing to Keep Proper Records
  • Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
  • Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
  • Failing to Provide Access to Records
  • Form of Record
  • Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
  • Deliberately Omitting Information
  • Falsifying or Concealing Identity
  • Tax Evasion
  • Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
  • Destruction of Evidence
  • Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
  • False Accounting
  • Falsification of Documents
  • Suppression of Documents

What happens next?

If you are facing a Destruction of Evidence charge, the stakes are high, and early action is key to ensuring the best possible outcome.

A specialist criminal lawyer at MK Law will guide you through the complexities of the legal process, help build a strong defence, and work to reduce the impact on your life, whether by securing an acquittal or negotiating a reduced penalty.

The sooner you begin, the more options you and your lawyer will have to navigate this serious charge effectively.

Do not delay, call MK Law on 1800 130 120 today.

Free Legal Advice 24/7

Contact Us

Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7

Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.

  • 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
  • 1800 130 120
  • marcus@mklawfirm.com.au