Have you been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What does it mean to be charged with failing to provide access to records?
If you have been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records under Section 53 of the Taxation Administration Act 1997, it is essential to understand the implications of this charge.
This offence revolves around the obligation to keep certain records under taxation law and to ensure they are available for inspection by the Commissioner of Taxation.
What Must the Prosecution Prove:
To secure a conviction for this offence, the prosecution must demonstrate the following elements:
1.You were required by taxation law to keep a record:
This involves confirming that the specific record in question falls under the statutory obligations of taxation law.
2. You failed to keep the record in a way that allowed it to be readily produced to the Commissioner:
This means the record was either not kept at all or not maintained in a manner that made it easily accessible when requested.
Penalties for failing to provide access to records:
The penalties associated with this offence are significant and vary depending on whether the defendant is a corporation or an individual:
- Body Corporate: Up to 200 penalty units.
- Individual: Up to 40 penalty units.
Where will my case be heard?
Charges for failing to provide access to Records are heard exclusively in the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria.
Factors and defences to consider:
When facing this charge, consider the following potential defences and mitigating circumstances:
- Record Requirement:
Establishing that the record in question was not actually required to be kept under taxation law may provide a viable defence.
- Access Issues:
If there were genuine reasons (e.g., unforeseen circumstances) for the failure to provide access to the records, these may be presented as mitigating factors.
- Readiness of Records:
If you can prove that the records were kept but were temporarily unavailable for reasons beyond your control, this may help reduce liability.
Questions to Ask:
Before deciding how to plead, discuss these key questions with your lawyer:
- Was the record required under taxation law?
- What specific steps were taken to maintain accessibility to the records?
- Are there any extenuating circumstances that may reduce your culpability?
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
I had a great experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. From our very first consultation, it was evident that Daniel approached his role with profe... Read MoreI had a great experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. From our very first consultation, it was evident that Daniel approached his role with professionalism, compassion, and confidence. He took the time to clearly explain each step of the process, ensuring that I felt informed and prepared every step of the way. His ability to convey complex legal situations in a straightforward manner made a significant difference in my understanding and comfort level. The outcome he achieved was a testament to his exceptional skill and unwavering commitment to my case. If you are in need of a lawyer who genuinely cares about their clients, communicates effectively, and fights tirelessly for the best possible result, I recommend Daniel Moon and the dedicated team at MK Law. Their support made a challenging experience much more manageable, and I am truly grateful for their expertise. Read Less55/5
-
I immediately knew that Daniel understood the details of my case and that his intelligence and diligence would give me the best chance of overcomi... Read MoreI immediately knew that Daniel understood the details of my case and that his intelligence and diligence would give me the best chance of overcoming the matter. His experience, professionalism and compassion made me feel defended from the get go. Luckily a good outcome too. Would highly recommend MK Law. Read Less55/5
-
I had an outstanding experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. He took the time to truly understand my situation and represented me with profession... Read MoreI had an outstanding experience with Daniel Moon from MK Law. He took the time to truly understand my situation and represented me with professionalism, compassion, and confidence in the Magistrates Court. Daniel didn’t just handle the legal side—he supported me as a person, not just a case file, and clearly explained every step so I always felt informed and prepared. The outcome he achieved reflected both his skill and commitment. If you need a lawyer who genuinely cares, communicates clearly, and fights hard for the best result, I strongly recommend Daniel and the team at MK Law. Read Less55/5
-
I want to sincerely thank my lawyer Mr Daniel Moon for representing me so well in court. He made me feel comfortable, as it was my first experienc... Read MoreI want to sincerely thank my lawyer Mr Daniel Moon for representing me so well in court. He made me feel comfortable, as it was my first experience in court. I liked his professionalism, preparation, confidence and attention to details. He explained everything clearly, guided me step by step, and fought for the best possible outcome for me. With him handling my case, it gave me a peace of mind during a very stressful time. The outcome spoke volumes about his expertise, and I would highly recommend them to anyone in need of strong legal representation. Read Less55/5
-
Good Faith, Use of Position and Use of Information as Criminal Offence
-
Financial Assistance by a Company for Acquiring Shares in the Company or a Holding Company
-
Failing to Keep Proper Records
-
Failing to Keep Additional Records for Taxation
-
Inclusion of False or Misleading Information in Records
-
Failing to Provide Access to Records
-
Form of Record
-
Giving False or Misleading Information to Tax Officers
-
Deliberately Omitting Information
-
Falsifying or Concealing Identity
-
Tax Evasion
-
Contaminating Goods with Intent to Cause, or Being Reckless as to Whether it would Cause, Public Alarm or Economic Loss
-
Destruction of Evidence
-
Corporate Criminal Responsibility, section 255
-
False Accounting
-
Falsification of Documents
-
Suppression of Documents
What happens next?
If you have been charged with Failing to Provide Access to Records, it is crucial to consult with an experienced criminal lawyer as soon as possible. Legal representation can help clarify whether the record was legally required, assess the strength of the prosecution’s case, and explore your defence options.
Contact MK Law on 1800 130 120 today to arrange an appointment with one of our knowledgeable lawyers. Timely legal advice and preparation are vital to achieving the best possible outcome in your case.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au