Have you been charged with refusing to comply with Directions made by Police Regarding a Breath Analysis?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
-
Driving Under the Influence (DUI)
-
Exceeding the Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol (“ PCA ”)
-
Refusing to Undergo a Preliminary Breath Test
-
Refuse or Fail to Comply with a Request or Signal to Stop
-
Refusing to Comply With Directions Made by Police Regarding
-
Exceeding the Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol (Breath Analysis) within 3 Hours
-
Driving a Motor Vehicle With a Blood Sample Indicating a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol
-
Expca of Drugs and Alcohol Within 3 Hours of Driving or Being in Charge
-
Consume Intoxicating Liquor While Driving
-
Consuming Intoxicating Liquor While Supervising Driving a Learner Driver
-
Breach of Alcohol Interlock Condition
What does it mean to refuse to comply with directions regarding a breath analysis?
Refusing to comply with directions made by police regarding breath analysis is an offence under sections 49(1)(e) and 55 of the Road Safety Act 1986 (“RSA”). This applies to individuals driving or in charge of a motor vehicle who refuse to comply with a lawful requirement made by a police officer.
Relevant Directions for Breath Analysis
The directions to undergo breath analysis for blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) that must be followed are specified under sections 55(1), (2), (2AA), (2A), and (9A) of the RSA.
Forms of Refusal
A refusal to comply with a requirement made by a police officer can take two forms:
- Verbal refusal: Expressing refusal through words.
- Conduct-based refusal: Failing to accompany a police officer to provide a sample or being physically uncooperative.
Section 55(1): Positive or Refusal to Take Preliminary Breath Test
If a person tests positive or refuses to undergo a preliminary breath test, section 55(1) allows a police officer to:
- Request the individual to undergo further breath analysis.
- Escort the person to a police car or station to provide a breath sample.
Section 55(2) and 55(2AA): Reasonable Belief of Alcohol/Drug Influence
Under sections 55(2) and 55(2AA) of the RSA:
- A police officer must have a reasonable belief that the individual was driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or exceeded the legal limit, within the past 3 hours.
- The officer can require the individual to undergo an assessment, provide a breath analysis sample, or escort them to a police car or station for testing.
- The officer can also instruct the person to remain where they are until directed to leave.
Section 55(2A): Breathalyser Malfunction or Insufficient Sample
If a police officer believes that the breathalyser device malfunctioned or the sample was insufficient, section 55(2A) allows the officer to:
- Request the person to provide an additional sample, such as due to equipment malfunction or insufficient exhaled air.
Section 55(9A): Blood Sample Collection
Under section 55(9A) of the RSA:
- The driver may be required to provide a blood sample or be escorted to a place where the sample can be taken.
- The person must remain at the location until the sample is taken, or 3 hours have passed.
- The police officer must document the reason for the request and disclose the legal basis for the requirement.
What does the prosecution need to prove?
- You were driving or in charge of a motor vehicle?
- A police officer or authorised person placed a demand on you to provide a breath sample,
- You refused to comply with that demand.
Factors to consider:
Should I plead guilty or not guilty?
- What defences do I have available to me to minimise my penalty?
- Have three hours lapsed since I last drove the motor vehicle?
- Do you have previous offences exhibiting similar behaviour?
What defences are available?
- Police made the demand whilst being trespassers on private property: Whether police had lawful power to remain on your private property to make a demand can often be a complex area of law. Withdrawing a police officer’s implied licence to remain on your property can be made explicitly or implicitly by conduct.
- Unable to physically comply: Vulnerable persons, the elderly or those in wheel chairs may be physically unable to accompany police back to a place for the purposes of a breath test if the only means available at the time was the pod at the rear of the police vehicle. If police have not provided you with a safe means of transport this may be a defence depending on the circumstances.
- Being unaware of the demand: In years gone by an accused was entitled to an acquittal if the formalities of the demand were not properly made out, for example by being informed of the need to remain at the police station for up to 3 hours. However today, case law has narrowed this requirement. There are still cases where the evidence may prove that you were not made fully aware of a need to comply with the police demand to accompany.
Where will my case be heard?
Offences involving alcohol or drugs, specifically for refusing to comply with a requirement will be adjudicated in the Magistrates Court of Victoria.
Penalties for Refusing to Comply with a Requirement
If you are found guilty of an offence involving alcohol or other drugs for refusing to comply with a requirement, the maximum penalties are as follows:
- First Offence: A fine of up to 12 penalty units.
- Second Offence: A fine of up to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for up to 12 months.
- Third or Subsequent Offence: A fine of up to 180 penalty units or imprisonment for up to 18 months.
Additionally, under section 50(1B), if convicted of an offence under section 49(1)(e) for refusing to comply with a requirement made under section 55, the court is required to:
- Suspend your driver’s licence or learner permit, and
- Disqualify you from driving for a minimum period of:
- 2 years for a first offence.
- 4 years for any subsequent offence.
These disqualification periods are mandatory minimums, meaning the Magistrate must disqualify you from driving for at least these periods. However, they have the discretion to impose longer disqualification periods, especially for repeat offenders.
-
Driving Under the Influence (DUI)
-
Exceeding the Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol (“ PCA ”)
-
Refusing to Undergo a Preliminary Breath Test
-
Refuse or Fail to Comply with a Request or Signal to Stop
-
Refusing to Comply With Directions Made by Police Regarding
-
Exceeding the Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol (Breath Analysis) within 3 Hours
-
Driving a Motor Vehicle With a Blood Sample Indicating a Prescribed Concentration of Alcohol
-
Expca of Drugs and Alcohol Within 3 Hours of Driving or Being in Charge
-
Consume Intoxicating Liquor While Driving
-
Consuming Intoxicating Liquor While Supervising Driving a Learner Driver
-
Breach of Alcohol Interlock Condition
Testimonials
What people Say
St Kilda, Victoria 3182
1800 130 120
-
Michael Sunderland from MK Law handled my matter with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. It was clear that he genuinely cared about gett... Read MoreMichael Sunderland from MK Law handled my matter with professionalism, respect, and genuine care. It was clear that he genuinely cared about getting the best result possible, and his preparation and courtroom presence reflected that commitment. Michael’s professional demeanour and respectful conduct, both with me and within the court, gave me the utmost confidence I was in the right hands. He clearly explained the process, kept me informed, and made me feel confident throughout. The outcome was far better than I expected, thanks to his expertise and strategic approach. I’m truly grateful for his support and wouldn’t hesitate to recommend him. Read Less55/5
-
I cannot thank Michael Sunderland from MK Law enough for the way he handled my case. From the very beginning, Michael was highly professional, kno... Read MoreI cannot thank Michael Sunderland from MK Law enough for the way he handled my case. From the very beginning, Michael was highly professional, knowledgeable, and thorough in every aspect of the process. He took the time to explain everything clearly, which gave me great comfort and confidence throughout what could have been a very stressful time. Michael’s expertise and guidance reassured me that I was in the best hands, and his calm and confident approach made a huge difference to my peace of mind. He was always approachable, responsive, and dedicated to achieving the best possible outcome for me. I would highly recommend Michael Sunderland to anyone seeking a lawyer who is not only exceptionally skilled but also genuinely cares about his clients. Read Less55/5
-
I would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first m... Read MoreI would like to sincerely thank Ashleigh for her exceptional support and professionalism during a very difficult time in my life. From the first meeting, she was calm, respectful, and clear about what I could expect. She never judged me, always listened carefully, and explained every step of the legal process in a way that made me feel supported and confident. Ashleigh handled my case involving a traffic offence with care and honesty. She gave me solid advice, helped me prepare all the right documents, and even guided me on how to speak respectfully in court. Because of her help, I was able to present myself properly before the judge and achieve a much better outcome than I expected. What really stood out to me was her genuine concern for my future. She didn’t treat me like “just another case.” Ashleigh is not only a skilled lawyer — she is also a kind person who truly cares about her clients. I highly recommend Ashleigh to anyone in need of legal help. She is trustworthy, professional, and goes above and beyond for her clients. Thank you again for everything. Read Less55/5
-
I would like to highly recommend Michael Sunderland. Michael took on my matter from another lawyer that was not able to represent me at the time. ... Read MoreI would like to highly recommend Michael Sunderland. Michael took on my matter from another lawyer that was not able to represent me at the time. Michael was well prepared, taking onboard all the information, with communication all the way. He clearly explains all the outcomes and was by my side every step of the way. A genuine caring lawyer that has your best interest. Read Less55/5
What happens next?
Contact MK Law today to get expert legal support for your case involving refusal to comply with a requirement. Our experienced team will guide you through each step, starting with an initial consultation to assess your situation and develop a tailored defence strategy.
We will help you prepare all necessary documentation and evidence, represent you in the Magistrates Court of Victoria, and advocate on your behalf. After the hearing, we’ll review the outcome, advise you on any penalties or appeals, and ensure you comply with court orders. If you need ongoing assistance or have further questions, MK Law is here to provide continuous support and protect your rights. Call 1800 130 120 today.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au